lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:49:03 +0800 From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com> To: <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <paulus@...ba.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org> CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangnan0@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [Question] How does perf still record the stack of a specified pid even when that process is interrupted and CPU is scheduled to other process On 2015/4/24 21:31, Yunlong Song wrote: > [Profiling Background] > Now we are profiling the performance of ext4 and f2fs on an eMMC card with iozone, > we find a case that ext4 is better than f2fs in random write under the test of > "iozone -s 262144 -r 64 -i 0 -i 2". We want to analyze the I/O delay of the two > file systems. We have got a conclusion that 1% of sys_write takes up 60% time of > the overall sys_write (262144/64=4096). We want to find out the call stack during > this specific 1% sys_write. Our idea is to record the stack in a certain time period > and since the specific 1% case takes up 60% time, the total number of records of its > stack should also takes up 60% of the total records, then we can recognize those stacks > and figure out what the I/O stack of f2fs is doing in the 1% case. > > [Profiling Problem] > > Although perf can record the events (with call stack) of a specified pid, e.g. using > "perf record -g iozone -s 262144 -r 64 -i 0 -i 2". But we find iozone is interrupted > and the CPU is scheduled to other process. As a result, perf will not record any events > of iozone until iozone's context is recovered and the CPU is scheduled to continue > processing the sys_write of iozone. >This obeys our initial idea which is described in [Profiling Background], This "disobeys" our initial idea which is described in [Profiling Background], since we cannot recognize the call stacks of the specific 1% case > by using the ratio of the record number. > > [Alternative Solution without Perf] > We can use /proc/#pid/stack to record the stack in a certain period (e.g. 1ms) of iozone, > no matter whether iozone is interrupted or not. However, we have not taken a deep sight > into this, since we want to use perf to do this kind of thing. > > [Question about Perf] > So we have a question that "How does perf still record the stack of a specified pid even > when that process is interrupted and CPU is scheduled to other process?" > -- Thanks, Yunlong Song -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists