[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553A4B76.9040207@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:56:06 +0800
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Question] How does perf still record the stack of a specified
pid even when that process is interrupted and CPU is scheduled to other process
On 2015/4/24 21:49, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/24/15 7:31 AM, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> [Profiling Problem]
>>
>> Although perf can record the events (with call stack) of a specified pid, e.g. using
>> "perf record -g iozone -s 262144 -r 64 -i 0 -i 2". But we find iozone is interrupted
>
> That command tells perf to *only* collect data for iozone. This command:
>
> perf record -g -a -- iozone ....
>
> tells perf to collect samples system wide as long as the iozone process is alive.
>
>
>
But we only want the records of iozone rather than the overall system, since other process
will interfere the targeted I/O stack of the specific 1% case, and we cannot figure out the
"clean" specific stack which takes up 60% time.
--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists