[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49vbglxq92.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:47:37 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: remove unused BIO_RW_BLOCK and BIO_EOF flags
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> index c2ee937..b0a5bff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> @@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ struct bio {
> * bio flags
> */
> #define BIO_UPTODATE 0 /* ok after I/O completion */
> -#define BIO_RW_BLOCK 1 /* RW_AHEAD set, and read/write would block */
> -#define BIO_EOF 2 /* out-out-bounds error */
> #define BIO_SEG_VALID 3 /* bi_phys_segments valid */
> #define BIO_CLONED 4 /* doesn't own data */
> #define BIO_BOUNCED 5 /* bio is a bounce bio */
Any particular reason you elected to leave a hole in the numbering? I
don't have a preference either way, but I don't think there's any harm
in compressing it.
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists