[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49r3r9xo7y.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:31:29 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: remove BIO_EOPNOTSUPP
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:
> Since the big barrier rewrite/removal in 2007 we never fail FLUSH or
> FUA requests, which means we can remove the magic BIO_EOPNOTSUPP flag
> to help propagating those to the buffer_head layer.
I had a look through the kernel, checking for places where maybe we were
relying on an EOPNOTSUPP from REQ_DISCARD, just to ensure you weren't
pulling out an error path that could still be used. I think everything
checks out.
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> index 992ef58..c2ee937 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> @@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ struct bio {
> #define BIO_CLONED 4 /* doesn't own data */
> #define BIO_BOUNCED 5 /* bio is a bounce bio */
> #define BIO_USER_MAPPED 6 /* contains user pages */
> -#define BIO_EOPNOTSUPP 7 /* not supported */
> #define BIO_NULL_MAPPED 8 /* contains invalid user pages */
> #define BIO_QUIET 9 /* Make BIO Quiet */
> #define BIO_SNAP_STABLE 10 /* bio data must be snapshotted during write */
Should we leave a hole in the numbering scheme?
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists