linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Sanitizing freed pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1429909549-11726-1-git-send-email-anisse@astier.eu>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:05:47 +0200
From:	Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Sanitizing freed pages

Hi,

I'm trying revive an old debate here[1], though with a simpler approach than
was previously tried. This patch series implements a new option to sanitize
freed pages, a (very) small subset of what is done in PaX/grsecurity[3],
inspired by a previous submission [4].

The first patch is fairly independent, and could be taken as-is. The second is
the meat and should be straight-forward to review.

There are a few different uses that this can cover:
 - some cases of use-after-free could be detected (crashes), although this not
   as efficient as KAsan/kmemcheck
 - it can help with long-term memory consumption in an environment with
   multiple VMs and Kernel Same-page Merging on the host. [2]
 - finally, it can reduce infoleaks, although this is hard to measure.

The approach is voluntarily kept as simple as possible. A single configuration
option, no command line option, no sysctl nob. It can of course be changed,
although I'd be wary of runtime-configuration options that could be used for
races.

I haven't been able to measure a meaningful performance difference when
compiling a (in-cache) kernel; I'd be interested to see what difference it
makes with your particular workload/hardware (I suspect mine is CPU-bound on
this small laptop).

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/334747/
[2] https://staff.aist.go.jp/k.suzaki/EuroSec12-SUZAKI-revised2.pdf
[3] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Grsecurity/Appendix/Grsecurity_and_PaX_Configuration_Options#Sanitize_all_freed_memory
[4] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/34398

Anisse Astier (2):
  mm/page_alloc.c: cleanup obsolete KM_USER*
  mm/page_alloc.c: add config option to sanitize freed pages

 mm/Kconfig      | 12 ++++++++++++
 mm/page_alloc.c | 15 +++++++--------
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/