linux-kernel - Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <553AB0CF.1010904@amd.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:08:31 -0500
From:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To:	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
CC:	"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
	"mjg59@...f.ucam.org" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"al.stone@...aro.org" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	"leo.duran@....com" <leo.duran@....com>,
	"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question.
> According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific.
> So why should we implement it in ACPICA core not OSPM specific modules?
> If this need to be implemented in ACPICA, then what about the following device identification objects?
> _DDN, _HRV, _MLS, _PLD, _STR, _SUN
>
> Thanks and best regards
> -Lv

Hi,

Sorry for late reply. As for the justification for introducing the _CLS 
support in the ACPICA, this is mainly because ACPI does not currently 
define _CID for certain device classes, which used to mostly be PCI 
devices. Instead, ACPI spec mentioned that _CLS can be used for loading 
generic drivers on hardware that is compatible with PCI-defined device 
classes, but that is not implemented on the PCI bus (and is therefore 
enumerated by ACPI.)

The code introduced for supporting _CLS is also similar in the way 
ACPICA is currently parsing the _CID or _SUB (which are also optional), 
and using it for the same purpose of identifying devices for loading 
drivers.

Also, since this method for identifying devices is OS-independent, I 
believe this should not be done in the OSPM specific modules.

Thanks,

Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/