linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: x86: make kASLR logic more accurate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150424215526.GB27123@treble.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:55:26 -0500
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: x86: make kASLR logic more accurate

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:59:03PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> We give up old_addr hint from the coming patch module in cases when kernel load
> base has been randomized (as in such case, the coming module has no idea about
> the exact randomization offset).
> 
> We are currently too pessimistic, and give up immediately as soon as 
> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is set; this doesn't however directly imply that the 
> load base has actually been randomized. There are config options that 
> disable kASLR (such as hibernation), user could have disabled kaslr on 
> kernel command-line, etc.
> 
> The loader propagates the information whether kernel has been randomized 
> through bootparams. This allows us to have the condition more accurate.
> 
> On top of that, it seems unnecessary to give up old_addr hints even if 
> randomization is active. The relocation offset can be computed as 
> difference between _text start and __START_KERNEL, and therefore old_addr 
> can be adjusted accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2: I accidentally used kgr_ suffix (which we use in kGraft) instead 
> 	  of klp_ in v1.
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h | 4 ++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c      | 5 +++++
>  kernel/livepatch/core.c          | 5 +++--
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> index 2d29197..84a3247 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> @@ -23,8 +23,12 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +
> +extern unsigned long klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset(void);
> +
>  static inline int klp_check_compiler_support(void)
>  {
>  #ifndef CC_USING_FENTRY
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c b/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> index ff3c3101d..6df7902 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c
> @@ -88,3 +88,8 @@ int klp_write_module_reloc(struct module *mod, unsigned long type,
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +unsigned long klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset(void)
> +{
> +	return (unsigned long)&_text - __START_KERNEL;
> +}
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index 284e269..ff4c35c 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -234,8 +234,9 @@ static int klp_find_verify_func_addr(struct klp_object *obj,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)
> -	/* KASLR is enabled, disregard old_addr from user */
> -	func->old_addr = 0;
> +	/* If KASLR has been enabled, adjust old_addr accordingly */
> +	if (kaslr_enabled())
> +		func->old_addr += klp_vmlinux_relocation_offset();
>  #endif

Can we remove the #ifdef now?  It would probably be better to have an
#ifdef in asm/setup.h for the kaslr_enabled() definition.

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/