[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150424071744.GA6146@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:17:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: Disable DMA support if DMA is not
available
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:15:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> If NO_DMA=y:
> >>
> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `fbtft_framebuffer_alloc':
> >> (.text+0xb53cae): undefined reference to `dmam_alloc_coherent'
> >>
> >> As DMA support is already optional, make it depend on HAS_DMA.
> >>
> >> If !HAS_DMA, "dma" will always be false, and the compiler will optimize
> >> away the call to dmam_alloc_coherent().
> >
> > Oh that's "sneaky" and not good, let's just make this driver be
> > dependant on DMA and be done with it. I don't like to rely on the
> > optimizer to get things to work properly.
>
> Alternatively, I can stick in one more #ifdef, to no longer rely on the compiler
> optimization?
That would be better.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists