[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553AFCC1.5070502@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:32:33 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
CC: jglisse@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de, aarcange@...hat.com,
airlied@...hat.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Cameron Buschardt <cabuschardt@...dia.com>,
Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
Geoffrey Gerfin <ggerfin@...dia.com>,
John McKenna <jmckenna@...dia.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Interacting with coherent memory on external devices
On 04/21/2015 05:44 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> AUTONUMA
>
> The Linux kernel's autonuma facility supports migrating both
> memory and processes to promote NUMA memory locality. It was
> accepted into 3.13 and is available in RHEL 7.0 and SLES 12.
> It is enabled by the Kconfig variable CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING.
>
> This approach uses a kernel thread "knuma_scand" that periodically
> marks pages inaccessible. The page-fault handler notes any
> mismatches between the NUMA node that the process is running on
> and the NUMA node on which the page resides.
Minor nit: marking pages inaccessible is done from task_work
nowadays, there no longer is a kernel thread.
> The result would be that the kernel would allocate only migratable
> pages within the CCAD device's memory, and even then only if
> memory was otherwise exhausted.
Does it make sense to allocate the device's page tables in memory
belonging to the device?
Is this a necessary thing with some devices? Jerome's HMM comes
to mind...
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists