lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429966457.2525.54.camel@hadess.net>
Date:	Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:54:17 +0200
From:	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
To:	Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: goodix: Check the 'data ready' bit before
 reading data

On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 12:48 +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> The MSB of the first byte read via I2C seems to indicate whether the
> data is valid (or ready) when an interrupt is raised. Previously, 
> this
> bit was ignored, which resulted in a lot of incorrect detections of
> "finger removed" events.

This seems correct, but the wording doesn't match the language used in 
the Goodix docs that were posted here some time ago[1].

I would have written:
The MSB of the first byte read via I2C at the coordinates address 
indicate whether the data is valid or ready (called "buffer status" in 
the datasheets) when an interrupt is raised. Previously, this bit was 
ignored, which resulted in a lot of incorrect detections of "finger 
removed" events.

And for the commit subject:
input: goodix: Check the 'buffer status' bit before reading data

This seems correct otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>

with the fixed commit message/subject

[1]: Linked from the device tree support patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/446838/
Page 16, table c, 0x814E is what we read for coordinates

> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c 
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> index ca19668..9fa6c5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ static int goodix_ts_read_input_report(struct 
> goodix_ts_data *ts, u8 *data)
>               return error;
>       }
>  
> +     if (!(data[0] & 0x80))
> +             return -EAGAIN;
> +
>       touch_num = data[0] & 0x0f;
>       if (touch_num > GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS)
>               return -EPROTO;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ