[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8220650.vMaWphVIuC@diego>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 15:44:11 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, emilio@...pez.com.ar,
dianders@...omium.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
mturquette@...aro.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks
Hi Stefan,
Am Samstag, 25. April 2015, 14:23:39 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> > Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> hat am 22. April 2015 um 22:53
> > geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Using orphan clocks can introduce strange behaviour as they don't have
> > rate information at all and also of course don't track
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > As this changes the behaviour for orphan clocks, it would of course
> > benefit from more testing than on my Rockchip boards. To keep the
> > recipent-list reasonable and not spam to much I selected one (the topmost)
> > from the get_maintainer output of each drivers/clk entry.
> > Hopefully some will provide Tested-by-tags :-)
>
> excuse me for my naive question, but what kind of tests do you expect
> (beside applying the patches)?
just a "everything that worked before still works" :-)
Using orphaned clocks should already produce strange issues most of the time -
for example I see clk_disable mismatches when suspending a rk3288 board,
before this patchset.
But nevertheless we now disallow the usage of orphaned clocks completely while
before it was possible to knowingly/unknowingly use them.
And while hopefully most drivers should handle an EPROBE_DEFER from clk_get
just fine, there may still be one or two lurking around that would need fixing
then ;-)
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists