[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150425172859.GE2449@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:28:59 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Scott Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] x86: mm: Enable deferred struct page
initialisation on x86-64
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:04:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>Within a NUMA node, however, we can split the
> >>memory initialization to 2 or more local CPUs if the memory size is
> >>big enough.
> >>
> >I considered it but discarded the idea. It'd be more complex to setup and
> >the two CPUs could simply end up contending on the same memory bus as
> >well as contending on zone->lock.
> >
>
> I don't think we need that now. However, we may have to consider
> this when one day even a single node can have TBs of memory unless
> we move to a page size larger than 4k.
>
We'll cross that bridge when we come to it. I suspect there is more room
for improvement in the initialisation that would be worth trying before
resorting to more threads. With more threads there is a risk that we hit
memory bus contention and a high risk that it actually is worse due to
contending on zone->lock when freeing the pages.
In the meantime, do you mind updating the before/after figures for your
test machine with this series please?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists