[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3550912.kR0pejLP0h@diego>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 20:47:49 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, khilman@...aro.org,
tomasz.figa@...il.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
galak@...eaurora.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
dianders@...omium.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/3] ARM: rk3288: Add PM Domain support
Hi Caesar,
thanks for keeping this alive :-)
Am Freitag, 24. April 2015, 16:07:45 schrieb Caesar Wang:
> Add power domain drivers based on generic power domain for
> Rockchip platform, and support RK3288.
>
> Verified on url =
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel.
>
> At the moment,there are mass of products are using the driver.
> I believe the driver can happy work for next kernel.
I've taken a look at the driver and here are some global remarks:
(1) You provide dt-bindings/power-domain/rk3288.h in patch 3. This breaks
bisectability, as the driver itself in patch 2 also includes the header and
would thus fail to compile if the later patch 3 is missing.
Ideally I think the header addition should be a separate patch itself, so that
we can possibly share it between driver and dts branches.
So 1: binding doc, 2: binding-header, 3: driver, 4: dts-changes.
(2) The dts-changes in patch 3 should also add any necessary power-domain
assignment on devices if they're still missing, so that we don't introduce
regressions. In my case my work-in-progress edp died because the powerdomain
was turned off automatically it seems.
(3) more like wondering @Kevin or so, is there some more generic place for a
power-domain driver nowadays?
(4) As Tomasz remarked previously the dts should represent the hardware and
the power-domains are part of the pmu. There is a recent addition from Linus
Walleij, called simple-mfd [a] that is supposed to get added real early for
kernel 4.2. So I'd think the power-domains should use that and the patchset
modified to include the changes shown below [b]?
(5) Keven Hilman and Tomasz had reservations about all the device clocks
being listed in the power-domains itself in the previous versions. I don't see
a comment from them yet changing that view.
Their wish was to get the clocks by reading the clocks from the device nodes,
though I see a problem on how to handle devices that do not have any bindings
at all yet.
Kevin, Tomasz any new thoughts?
Heiko
[a] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/commit/?h=simple-mfd&id=fcf294c020ff7ee4e3b1e96159e4dc7a17ad59d1
[b]
Subject: [PATCH] make power-domains a child of the pmu
This should of course be distributed across the original patches and not
be a separate patch.
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 118 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c | 11 +++-
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
index 9696f51..b9ba79013 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
@@ -549,8 +549,66 @@
};
pmu: power-management@...30000 {
- compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-pmu", "syscon";
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-pmu", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
reg = <0xff730000 0x100>;
+
+ power: power-controller {
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller";
+ #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+ rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ pd_gpu {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_GPU>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
+ };
+
+ pd_hevc {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_HEVC>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_HEVC>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HEVC_CABAC>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HEVC_CORE>,
+ <&cru HCLK_HEVC>;
+ };
+
+ pd_vio {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_VIO>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_IEP>,
+ <&cru ACLK_ISP>,
+ <&cru ACLK_RGA>,
+ <&cru ACLK_VIP>,
+ <&cru ACLK_VOP0>,
+ <&cru ACLK_VOP1>,
+ <&cru DCLK_VOP0>,
+ <&cru DCLK_VOP1>,
+ <&cru HCLK_IEP>,
+ <&cru HCLK_ISP>,
+ <&cru HCLK_RGA>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VIP>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VOP0>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VOP1>,
+ <&cru PCLK_EDP_CTRL>,
+ <&cru PCLK_HDMI_CTRL>,
+ <&cru PCLK_LVDS_PHY>,
+ <&cru PCLK_MIPI_CSI>,
+ <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DSI0>,
+ <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DSI1>,
+ <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>,
+ <&cru SCLK_EDP>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HDMI_CEC>,
+ <&cru SCLK_HDMI_HDCP>,
+ <&cru SCLK_ISP_JPE>,
+ <&cru SCLK_ISP>,
+ <&cru SCLK_RGA>;
+ };
+
+ pd_video {
+ reg = <RK3288_PD_VIDEO>;
+ clocks = <&cru ACLK_VCODEC>,
+ <&cru HCLK_VCODEC>;
+ };
+ };
};
sgrf: syscon@...40000 {
@@ -1316,62 +1374,4 @@
};
};
};
-
- power: power-controller {
- compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller";
- #power-domain-cells = <1>;
- rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
-
- pd_gpu {
- reg = <RK3288_PD_GPU>;
- clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
- };
-
- pd_hevc {
- reg = <RK3288_PD_HEVC>;
- clocks = <&cru ACLK_HEVC>,
- <&cru SCLK_HEVC_CABAC>,
- <&cru SCLK_HEVC_CORE>,
- <&cru HCLK_HEVC>;
- };
-
- pd_vio {
- reg = <RK3288_PD_VIO>;
- clocks = <&cru ACLK_IEP>,
- <&cru ACLK_ISP>,
- <&cru ACLK_RGA>,
- <&cru ACLK_VIP>,
- <&cru ACLK_VOP0>,
- <&cru ACLK_VOP1>,
- <&cru DCLK_VOP0>,
- <&cru DCLK_VOP1>,
- <&cru HCLK_IEP>,
- <&cru HCLK_ISP>,
- <&cru HCLK_RGA>,
- <&cru HCLK_VIP>,
- <&cru HCLK_VOP0>,
- <&cru HCLK_VOP1>,
- <&cru PCLK_EDP_CTRL>,
- <&cru PCLK_HDMI_CTRL>,
- <&cru PCLK_LVDS_PHY>,
- <&cru PCLK_MIPI_CSI>,
- <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DSI0>,
- <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DSI1>,
- <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>,
- <&cru SCLK_EDP>,
- <&cru SCLK_HDMI_CEC>,
- <&cru SCLK_HDMI_HDCP>,
- <&cru SCLK_ISP_JPE>,
- <&cru SCLK_ISP>,
- <&cru SCLK_RGA>;
- };
-
- pd_video {
- reg = <RK3288_PD_VIDEO>;
- clocks = <&cru ACLK_VCODEC>,
- <&cru HCLK_VCODEC>;
- };
- };
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c
index 92d2569..f3d87c21 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
struct device_node *node;
+ struct device *parent;
struct rockchip_pmu *pmu;
const struct of_device_id *match;
const struct rockchip_pmu_info *pmu_info;
@@ -410,9 +411,13 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pmu->genpd_data.domains = pmu->domains;
pmu->genpd_data.num_domains = pmu_info->num_domains;
- node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rockchip,pmu", 0);
- pmu->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
- of_node_put(node);
+ parent = dev->parent;
+ if (!parent) {
+ dev_err(dev, "no parent for syscon LED\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ pmu->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(parent->of_node);
if (IS_ERR(pmu->regmap)) {
error = PTR_ERR(pmu->regmap);
dev_err(dev, "failed to get PMU regmap: %d\n", error);
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists