[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150425043817.GM13605@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:38:17 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: fix IMC missing box initialization
> This leads me to believe that this patch:
>
> commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
> Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +0000
>
> perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver initialization
>
> If I revert it, I bet things will work again.
Yes the initialization needs to be moved out of the IPI context.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists