linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 05/31] tcp: fix FRTO undo on cumulative ACK of SACKed range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:46:25 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 05/31] tcp: fix FRTO undo on cumulative ACK of SACKed range

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 666b805150efd62f05810ff0db08f44a2370c937 ]

On processing cumulative ACKs, the FRTO code was not checking the
SACKed bit, meaning that there could be a spurious FRTO undo on a
cumulative ACK of a previously SACKed skb.

The FRTO code should only consider a cumulative ACK to indicate that
an original/unretransmitted skb is newly ACKed if the skb was not yet
SACKed.

The effect of the spurious FRTO undo would typically be to make the
connection think that all previously-sent packets were in flight when
they really weren't, leading to a stall and an RTO.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Fixes: e33099f96d99c ("tcp: implement RFC5682 F-RTO")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3076,10 +3076,11 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct so
 			if (seq_rtt < 0) {
 				seq_rtt = ca_seq_rtt;
 			}
-			if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
+			if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)) {
 				reord = min(pkts_acked, reord);
-			if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq))
-				flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;
+				if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq))
+					flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/