linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] cgroups: use bitmask to filter for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOviyagvVTKjRp4wxyNo4Oke-w=Wbda+UyHAN-ih9yFX-8jqmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 02:05:47 +1000
From:	Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, richard@....at,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] cgroups: use bitmask to filter for_each_subsys

Hey,

>> > >  static struct cftype cgroup_dfl_base_files[];
>> > > +#define for_each_subsys_which(ss_mask, ss, ssid) \
>> > > + for_each_subsys((ss), (ssid)) \
>> > > +         if ((ss_mask) & (1 << (ssid)))
>> >
>> > Maybe using for_each_set_bit() is better?
>> >
>> > #define for_each_subsys_which(ss_mask, ss, ssid)            \
>> >     for_each_set_bit(ssid, &(ss_mask), CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT) \
>> >             if ((ss) = group_subsys[ssid] && false)         \
>> >                     ;                                       \
>> >             else
>>
>> Clever that ;-)
>
> Thanks.  It kinda bothers me that for_each_set_bit() doesn't collapse
> to combo of ffs() + clearing bit off of a temp mask when size is const
> and <= ulong, which would be quite a bit lighter.  Right now it'd be
> calling into generic find_first/next_bit() functions unconditionally.
> Ah well, it can be optimized later.

This macro causes issues with lines like:
   for_each_subsys_which(ss, ssid, ~cgrp_dfl_root_inhibit_ss_mask)

In addition, there are a bunch of cgroup_* functions that use unsigned
ints for bitops (cgroup_calc_child_subsys_mask, rebind_subsystems,
cgroup_print_ss_mask). Is there a better solution to this problem, or
should I just switch back to my naive solution?

--
Aleksa Sarai (cyphar)
www.cyphar.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/