[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150426084221.GE5627@lukather>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 10:42:21 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sunxi: spi: use proper errno when message is
too long.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 09:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
No commit log?
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 2 +-
> drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> index fbb0a4d..8238b4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int sun4i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>
> /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */
> if (tfr->len > SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
Is it still a thing? The patch to remove such limit hasn't been merged
yet?
> reinit_completion(&sspi->done);
> sspi->tx_buf = tfr->tx_buf;
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> index ac48f59..0f5dd91 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>
> /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */
> if (tfr->len > SUN6I_FIFO_DEPTH)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
Eventually, we should move to using DMA for these messages longer than
the FIFO.
I should post these patches.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists