[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tww2ejit.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:12:26 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc.c: add config option to sanitize freed pages
Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu> writes:
> + If unsure, say N.
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 05fcec9..c71440a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -803,6 +803,11 @@ static bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
> PAGE_SIZE << order);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SANITIZE_FREED_PAGES
> + zero_pages(page, order);
> +#endif
And not removing the clear on __GFP_ZERO by remembering that?
That means all clears would be done twice.
That patch is far too simple. Clearing is commonly the most
expensive kernel operation.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists