[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553CCABA.3090504@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:23:38 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: broonie@...nel.org, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
CC: linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.
Hi,
On 26-04-15 13:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>> No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
>>> fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
>
>> And how do you get spidev if nothing binds to it?
>
>> When you boot without the binding no device is created.
>
> Describe your actual hardware in the DT then add the relevant device ID
> to spidev.
I think there is actual a use for just binding spidev as spidev,
think e.g. the spi pins on the raspberry pi.
How do you deal we suggest with such a situation ?
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists