linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:56:14 +0200
From:	Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>
To:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:	broonie@...nel.org, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.


> On 26.04.2015, at 13:23, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> I think there is actual a use for just binding spidev as spidev,
> think e.g. the spi pins on the raspberry pi.
> 
> How do you deal we suggest with such a situation ?

I actually asked the same question a few days ago on the spi list
(in thread: "spi: spidev: Warn loudly if instantiated from DT as “spidev”)
and the summary was:

You can still do as before, but you have to accept that long 
irritating warning.

Or you patch spidev.c to include your pattern of choice for compatiblity

Or you implement the following proposal (which needs a volunteer):
> On 23.04.2015, at 09:42, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> 
> So what you need is a way to handover from generic spidev to a device-specific
> driver, cfr. what graphics drivers do when the device has been bound to by
> vesafb or simplefb.
> 
> Could this be implemented in a generic way in the spi or DT code?

...
> On 23.04.2015, at 12:36, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:45:16AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
>> I guess this has been suggested before: the spi core could provide spidev
>> access to all spi client devices which are not bound by a driver?
> 
> I don't know if it's been suggested before, certainly nobody did the
> work to make it happen.  I don't think I have a massive objection in
> principal.


Martin



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/