lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150426134209.439784058@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:46:24 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, "D.S. Ljungmark" <ljungmark@...io.se>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 04/31] ipv6: Dont reduce hop limit for an interface

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "D.S. Ljungmark" <ljungmark@...io.se>

[ Upstream commit 6fd99094de2b83d1d4c8457f2c83483b2828e75a ]

A local route may have a lower hop_limit set than global routes do.

RFC 3756, Section 4.2.7, "Parameter Spoofing"

>   1.  The attacker includes a Current Hop Limit of one or another small
>       number which the attacker knows will cause legitimate packets to
>       be dropped before they reach their destination.

>   As an example, one possible approach to mitigate this threat is to
>   ignore very small hop limits.  The nodes could implement a
>   configurable minimum hop limit, and ignore attempts to set it below
>   said limit.

Signed-off-by: D.S. Ljungmark <ljungmark@...io.se>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv6/ndisc.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
@@ -1193,7 +1193,14 @@ static void ndisc_router_discovery(struc
 	if (rt)
 		rt6_set_expires(rt, jiffies + (HZ * lifetime));
 	if (ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
-		in6_dev->cnf.hop_limit = ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit;
+		/* Only set hop_limit on the interface if it is higher than
+		 * the current hop_limit.
+		 */
+		if (in6_dev->cnf.hop_limit < ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
+			in6_dev->cnf.hop_limit = ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit;
+		} else {
+			ND_PRINTK(2, warn, "RA: Got route advertisement with lower hop_limit than current\n");
+		}
 		if (rt)
 			dst_metric_set(&rt->dst, RTAX_HOPLIMIT,
 				       ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ