linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150427094238.GA4649@kernel>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:42:38 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in
 pull algorithm

How about patch 1/7? :)
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 04:53:13PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>Function pick_next_earliest_dl_task is used to pick earliest and pushable
>dl task from overloaded cpus in pull algorithm, however, it traverses
>runqueue rbtree instead of pushable task rbtree which is also ordered by
>tasks' deadlines. This will result in getting no candidates from overloaded
>cpus if all the dl tasks on the overloaded cpus are pinned. This patch fix
>it by traversing pushable task rbtree which is also ordered by tasks'
>deadlines.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
>---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>index 5e95145..b57ceba 100644
>--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>@@ -1230,6 +1230,33 @@ next_node:
> 	return NULL;
> }
> 
>+/*
>+ * Return the earliest pushable rq's task, which is suitable to be executed
>+ * on the cpu, NULL otherwse
>+ */
>+static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq,
>+									int cpu)
>+{
>+	struct rb_node *next_node = rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost;
>+	struct task_struct *p = NULL;
>+
>+	if (!has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq))
>+		return NULL;
>+
>+next_node:
>+	if (next_node) {
>+		p = rb_entry(next_node, struct task_struct, pushable_dl_tasks);
>+
>+		if (pick_dl_task(rq, p, cpu))
>+			return p;
>+
>+		next_node = rb_next(next_node);
>+		goto next_node;
>+	}
>+
>+	return NULL;
>+}
>+
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, local_cpu_mask_dl);
> 
> static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
>@@ -1514,7 +1541,7 @@ static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq)
> 		if (src_rq->dl.dl_nr_running <= 1)
> 			goto skip;
> 
>-		p = pick_next_earliest_dl_task(src_rq, this_cpu);
>+		p = pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(src_rq, this_cpu);
> 
> 		/*
> 		 * We found a task to be pulled if:
>-- 
>1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/