[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11982715D62E664DBACA4351A418B0581437DA44@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:00:11 +0000
From: "Nicolae, Anda-maria" <anda-maria.nicolae@...el.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC: "sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
"dbaryshkov@...il.com" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] power_supply: Add support for Richtek rt9455 battery
charger
Hello Paul,
Thanks for feedback :).
I understand. I will change the license to GPL.
Thanks,
Anda
________________________________________
From: Paul Bolle [pebolle@...cali.nl]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:00 PM
To: Nicolae, Anda-maria
Cc: sre@...nel.org; dbaryshkov@...il.com; robh+dt@...nel.org; pawel.moll@....com; mark.rutland@....com; ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk; galak@...eaurora.org; dwmw2@...radead.org; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power_supply: Add support for Richtek rt9455 battery charger
Just a single nit: a license mismatch.
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:57 +0300, Anda-Maria Nicolae wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/power/rt9455_charger.c
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
This states the license is GPL v2 or later.
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
And, according to include/linux/module.h, this states the license is
(only) GPL v2. So I think either the license comment or the ident used
in the MODULE_LICENSE() macro should be changed.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists