linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/23] gpio: sysfs: rename gpiochip registration functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAVeFuLOwa53YgcHVj9uGa+KLpV2Et-iEAwKEK3vhtJgQSJH4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:54:36 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/23] gpio: sysfs: rename gpiochip registration functions

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> Rename the gpio-chip export/unexport functions to the more descriptive
> names gpiochip_register and gpiochip_unregister.

Since these functions are related to sysfs, wouldn't
gpiochip_sysfs_export (or gpiochip_sysfs_register, although the former
sounds better to me) be even more descriptive?

The renaming should probably also cover the non-static gpiod_*
functions of gpiolib-sysfs.c which are equally ambiguous. Basically
anything non-static from gpiolib-sysfs.c should have that prefix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/