linux-kernel - [PATCH] ARM: gic: Document Power and Clock Domain optional properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:00:11 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
To:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: gic: Document Power and Clock Domain optional properties

On some SoCs, the GIC may be part of a PM Domain (hardware Power and/or
Clock Domain).  Document the related optional DT properties.

Note: As the current GIC driver doesn't support Runtime PM yet, PM
Domain constraints must be handled elsewhere in e.g. platform code.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
---
To preserve DT stability, we would like to add these properties to the
affected shmobile dtsi files.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
> On 25/03/15 21:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> I would like to add the clock and GIC dependency on the clock in the DTS now,
>> for reasons of DTS stability. But that means I need a temporary workaround
>> to avoid the clock from being disabled, until the GIC driver handles this.
>>
>> I don't expect a fix for the GIC code to just show up magically. I just wanted
>> you to be aware of the problem. GIC is not the only problematic module here,
>> there are others, cfr. the last slide of [2].
>
> As long as there is an agreement from the DT people on the presence of
> that extra property in the GIC node, I'm happy with that. I'd like it to
> be documented though.

Full thread at
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/331876.html

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
index 2da059a4790cb3c6..b21113b35f085f27 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
@@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ Optional
   regions, used when the GIC doesn't have banked registers. The offset is
   cpu-offset * cpu-nr.
 
+- power-domains : A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of
+		  the power controller specified by phandle, used when the GIC
+		  is part of a Power or Clock Domain.
+
+- clocks        : A phandle and clock specifier as defined by bindings of
+		  the clock controller specified by phandle, used when the GIC
+		  is part of a Clock Domain.
+
 Example:
 
 	intc: interrupt-controller@...11000 {
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/