[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553E6328.2040904@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:26:16 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitmap: remove explicit newline handling using scnprintf
format string
On 27/04/15 17:14, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Sudeep.
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46:58AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> int bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const unsigned long *maskp,
>> int nmaskbits)
>> {
>> - ptrdiff_t len = PTR_ALIGN(buf + PAGE_SIZE - 1, PAGE_SIZE) - buf - 2;
>> + ptrdiff_t len = PTR_ALIGN(buf + PAGE_SIZE - 1, PAGE_SIZE) - buf;
>> int n = 0;
>>
>> - if (len > 1) {
>> - n = list ? scnprintf(buf, len, "%*pbl", nmaskbits, maskp) :
>> - scnprintf(buf, len, "%*pb", nmaskbits, maskp);
>> - buf[n++] = '\n';
>> - buf[n] = '\0';
>> - }
>> + if (len > 1)
>> + n = list ? scnprintf(buf, len, "%*pbl\n", nmaskbits, maskp) :
>> + scnprintf(buf, len, "%*pb\n", nmaskbits, maskp);
>> return n;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_print_to_pagebuf);
>
> So, there's one behavior difference stemming from this. When the
> buffer is too small, the original code would still output '\n' at the
> end while the new code would just continue to print the formatted
> string.
Completely agree and in-fact we did discuss that internally too.
But since this function deals only with page size buffers, we thought
it's highly unlikely to hit that corner case.
> Given that bitmap outputs can be pretty long, this behavior
> difference has a minute but still non-zero chance of causing something
> surprising. There are multiple copies of the above function in arch
> codes too.
I assumed that I had consolidated most of them in commit 5aaba36318e5
("cpumask: factor out show_cpumap into separate helper function").
I might have missed, will have a look at it again.
> We prolly want to audit the usages to verify that the
> passed in buffer is always big enough at which point the above
> function and its copies can simply be replaced with direct scnprintf()
> calls. This function doesn't actually add anything.
>
Ah, right that would be much simpler.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists