[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553EEF5F.1090703@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:24:31 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 V8] workqueue: Allow modifying low level unbound workqueue
cpumask
On 04/28/2015 09:44 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>>
>>> + /* save the user configured attrs */
>>> + cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
>>
>> Wouldn't this make a lot more sense above when copying @attrs into
>> @new_attrs? The comment there even says "make a copy of @attrs and
>> sanitize it". Copy to @new_attrs, mask with wq_unbound_cpumask and
>> fall back to wq_unbound_cpumask if empty.
We need to save the user original configured attrs.
When any time wq_unbound_cpumask is changed, we should use
the user original configured attrs (cpumask) to re-calculate
the pwqs and avoid losing any information.
>
> It should be:
>
> + copy_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs, attrs);
> + cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists