[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ2kueU5-kZx2-eTBg9B=nUpU1Anx8u+M3XckRUYWWwnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:37:10 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] sched/idle: Use explicit broadcast oneshot control function
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> Sudeep:
>> At-least I observed issue only when I am using hardware broadcast timer.
>> It doesn't hang when I am using hrtimer as broadcast timer in which case
>> one of the cpu will be not enter deeper idle states that lose timer.
>> I will rerun on v4.1-rc1 and post the complete log.
>
> So the bug here is that cpuidle_enter() enables interrupts, so the
> assumption about them being not enabled made by
> tick_broadcast_oneshot_control() is actually not valid.
>
> It looks like we need to acquire the clockevents_lock at least in this
> particular case. Let me see where to put it and I'll send a patch for
> testing.
Aha that looks very much like it. Put me on the patch and I'll
take it for a spin.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists