lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:55:58 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] mfd: syscon: Add Atmel MC (Memory Controller)
 registers definition

Hi,

On 28/04/2015 at 13:30:58 +0100, Lee Jones wrote :
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> 
> > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > 
> > The at91rm9200 SoC embeds a Memory Controller block which is used to
> > configure several aspects of the platform:
> > - AHB/APB Bus behavior
> > - SDRAM Controller
> > - EBI (External Bus Interface) and SMC (Static Memory Controller) config
> > 
> > Those registers might be accessed by different drivers, hence we need to
> > define it as a syscon device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h
> 
> I've lost context here.
> 
> Is it okay to take this now?
> 

I'd say that it would be better to get that one through the AT91 tree
along with the following patches as they depend on it. Is that okay with
you?


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ