[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150428162734.GA2539@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:27:34 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 04/28] mm, thp: adjust conditions when we can reuse the
page on WP fault
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:02:46AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >
> > With new refcounting we will be able map the same compound page with
> > PTEs and PMDs. It requires adjustment to conditions when we can reuse
> > the page on write-protection fault.
> >
> > For PTE fault we can't reuse the page if it's part of huge page.
> >
> > For PMD we can only reuse the page if nobody else maps the huge page or
> > it's part. We can do it by checking page_mapcount() on each sub-page,
> > but it's expensive.
> >
> > The cheaper way is to check page_count() to be equal 1: every mapcount
> > takes page reference, so this way we can guarantee, that the PMD is the
> > only mapping.
> >
> > This approach can give false negative if somebody pinned the page, but
> > that doesn't affect correctness.
> >
> Then we have to try more to allocate THP if pinned?
> Are we adding new cost?
Yes we do. But that shouldn't be often.
Alternatively, we could iterate over all sub-pages and check their
mapcount.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists