[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMqctSEAd-WeBRLabvDugN04XaqY6Y1UyO9UPLaTW9ce7t_rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:43:37 +0200
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eric D." <eric.dillmann@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.
On 28 April 2015 at 19:17, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 28 April 2015 at 16:16, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> > That is not the case as you well know. As has been said several times
>> > the compatible for the device should be added to the match table in
>> > spidev.c.
>
>> That's a way unusable for people who actually want to use spidev so it
>> might be TheApprovedWay(tm) but not RightWay(tm).
>
> I'm pretty sure that someone who's able to edit one file can edit two.
> I know you have a viewpoint on this but engaging in this way is not
> helping anyone.
The point is that patching the kernel to use spidev is totally useless
complication which is brought on spidev users by obtuse kernel
maintainers.
This patch applied to a kernel which is distributed with the board
solves the problem for all spidev users of the board which
TheApprovedWay(tm) does not.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists