[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVJafaxJwZi1C8cAsQs51nvGFywAkNTNbc=BjE+bjBgnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:06:15 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Nicholas Moulin <nicholas.w.moulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...ux.intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] libnd: non-volatile memory device support
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>>> Changes since v1 [1]: Incorporates feedback received prior to April 24.
>>>
>>> 1/ Ingo said [2]:
>>>
>>> "So why on earth is this whole concept and the naming itself
>>> ('drivers/block/nd/' stands for 'NFIT Defined', apparently)
>>> revolving around a specific 'firmware' mindset and revolving
>>> around specific, weirdly named, overly complicated looking
>>> firmware interfaces that come with their own new weird
>>> glossary??"
>>>
>>> Indeed, we of course consulted the NFIT specification to determine
>>> the shape of the sub-system, but then let its terms and data
>>> structures permeate too deep into the implementation. That is fixed
>>> now with all NFIT specifics factored out into acpi.c. The NFIT is no
>>> longer required reading to review libnd. Only three concepts are
>>> needed:
>>>
>>> i/ PMEM - contiguous memory range where cpu stores are
>>> persistent once they are flushed through the memory
>>> controller.
>>>
>>> ii/ BLK - mmio apertures (sliding windows) that can be
>>> programmed to access an aperture's-worth of persistent
>>> media at a time.
>>>
>>> iii/ DPA - "dimm-physical-address", address space local to a
>>> dimm. A dimm may provide both PMEM-mode and BLK-mode
>>> access to a range of DPA. libnd manages allocation of DPA
>>> to either PMEM or BLK-namespaces to resolve this aliasing.
>>
>> Mostly for my understanding: is there a name for "address relative to
>> the address lines on the DIMM"? That is, a DIMM that exposes 8 GB of
>> apparent physical memory, possibly interleaved, broken up, or weirdly
>> remapped by the memory controller, would still have addresses between
>> 0 and 8 GB. Some of those might be PMEM windows, some might be MMIO,
>> some might be BLK apertures, etc.
>>
>> IIUC "DPA" refers to actual addressable storage, not this type of address?
>
> No, DPA is exactly as you describe above. You can't directly access
> it except through a PMEM mapping (possibly interleaved with DPA from
> other DIMMs) or a BLK aperture (mmio window into DPA).
So the thing I'm describing has no name, then? Oh, well.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists