| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJgfmqUOWh46+yVKhon7tHAyBByDVWPZ7wiQ-pS_KuUfbVnRNA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:44:19 +0200 From: "Fred .Flintstone" <eldmannen@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: kdbus vs Plumber? Plumber is the IPC system from Plan 9 from Bell Labs? It was written by Rob Pike. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumber_%28program%29 How does kdbus compare against Plumber? Could Plumber be used instead? Is Plumber a better solution? Plumber together with 9P is also network transparent. Plumber is dead simple and much less complex than D-Bus, and it also follows the Unix philosophy of "everything is a file". Here is a *very* interesting post about Plumber, which asks to replace D-Bus. https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/12/msg00802.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists