[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150429072328.GA2987@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:23:28 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 9/9] zram: add dynamic device add/remove functionality
On (04/29/15 16:02), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> sure. I was talking about this one:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> umount
> zram_remove()
> lock ->bd_mutex
> zram_reset_device()
> unlock ->bd_mutex
> disksize_store
> mount
> echo 'test' > /mnt/test
> kfree zram
> zram write
>
I'll take a look later today. currently I think of something like:
sysfs_remove_group()
lock ->bd_mutex
... check ->bd_openers
zram_reset_device()
blk_cleanup_queue()
del_gendisk()
put_disk()
unlock ->bd_mutex
bdput bdev
idr_remove()
kfree(zram)
iow, idr_remove() and kfree() are done outside of ->bd_mutex lock.
but I may be wrong. haven't tested yet. but seems reasonable: we
invalidate ->bdev, delete partitions, etc., holding ->bd_mutex and
then release ->bdev, which does final put. need to check that in
detail.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists