[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150429084152.GP9169@x1>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:41:52 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 03:04:06PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Hi Mark and Lee,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:32:09AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fix broken probe of da9052 regulators, which since commit b3f6c73db732
> > > > ("mfd: da9052-core: Fix platform-device id collision") use a
> > > > non-deterministic platform-device id to retrieve static regulator
> > > > information. Fortunately, adequate error handling was in place so probe
> > > > would simply fail with an error message.
> > > >
> > > > Update the mfd-cell ids to be zero-based and use those to identify the
> > > > cells when probing the regulator devices.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: b3f6c73db732 ("mfd: da9052-core: Fix platform-device id collision")
> > > > Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.19
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mfd/da9052-core.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c | 5 +++--
> > >
> > > Need an Ack from Mark, but looks good to me.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >
> > Mark, did you have a chance to look at this one?
> >
> > It fixes a regression due to an mfd commit, but not sure who of you that
> > wants to take it.
>
> It's now been over a month and this still hasn't been applied even
> though it fixes a regression.
>
> Lee, perhaps you should take it through MFD as it was an MFD commit that
> broke it?
I'm in the same situation -- can't do anything without an Ack from Mark.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists