linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] net/macb: Fix UDPv4 checksum offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:15:21 +0100
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jaeden Amero <jaeden.amero@...com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff.westfahl@...com, mihai.neagu@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net/macb: Fix UDPv4 checksum offload

> Unfortunately, the Cadence MACB doesn't support the enabling or
> disabling of checksum generation per descriptor.

So how does packet forwarding work ? If that means the device is
re-checksumming packets it is forwarding then that's really not very good
at all, especially if it takes frames that are unchecksummed and corrupts
them with a checksum midflight which is based upon unknown validity.

Other question: you seem to be assuming that the headers in part are
valid. That's not necessarily the case (even for local traffic you can
get UDP frames sent via RAW sockets that are invalid - eg with the ihl
pointing beyond the end of the packet). Given you then write into that
offset isn't a length check needed.

That might also be a useful fast path for longer frames, as you know the
worst case length for a 2 byte UDP frame.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/