[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5540BFEA.8080601@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:26:34 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/25] perf tools: Add AUX area tracing index
On 28/04/15 15:07, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:29:46PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +
>> +int auxtrace_index__process(int fd, u64 size, struct perf_session *session,
>> + bool needs_swap)
>> +{
>> + struct list_head *head = &session->auxtrace_index;
>> + u64 nr;
>> +
>> + if (readn(fd, &nr, sizeof(u64)) != sizeof(u64))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + if (needs_swap)
>> + nr = bswap_64(nr);
>> +
>> + if (sizeof(u64) + nr * sizeof(struct auxtrace_index_entry) != size)
>> + return -1;
>
> so the total nr is only used to double check the data size is correct,
> it could be omited and you could use just the size of the section..
> also the auxtrace_index__write would be shorter of one loop
>
> but no big deal.. just asking ;-)
I would like to have it as a check that the file structure is the way it is
meant to be.
Also I will change it to " > size" so that more stuff can be added to the
section in the future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists