[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5540D93D.5010700@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:14:37 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/25] perf record: Add AUX area tracing Snapshot Mode
support
On 28/04/15 16:24, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:29:53PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> char msg[512];
>> @@ -238,7 +302,8 @@ try_again:
>> }
>>
>> if (perf_evlist__mmap_ex(evlist, opts->mmap_pages, false,
>> - opts->auxtrace_mmap_pages, false) < 0) {
>> + opts->auxtrace_mmap_pages,
>> + opts->auxtrace_snapshot_mode) < 0) {
>> if (errno == EPERM) {
>> pr_err("Permission error mapping pages.\n"
>> "Consider increasing "
>> @@ -349,7 +414,7 @@ static int record__mmap_read_all(struct record *rec)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (mm->base &&
>> + if (mm->base && !rec->opts.auxtrace_snapshot_mode &&
>> record__auxtrace_mmap_read(rec, mm) != 0) {
>> rc = -1;
>> goto out;
>> @@ -404,6 +469,8 @@ static void workload_exec_failed_signal(int signo __maybe_unused,
>> child_finished = 1;
>> }
>>
>> +static void snapshot_sig_handler(int sig);
>
> seems there's no need for forward declaration,
> you can define the function right here, no?
snapshot_sig_handler is dependent on "record" so the forward
declaration does seem to be needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists