linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:46:47 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

Am 29.04.2015 um 15:38 schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> On 29.04.2015 15:33, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> It depends how you define "beginning". To me an initramfs is a *very* minimal
>> tool to prepare the rootfs and nothing more (no udev, no systemd, no
>> "mini distro").
>> If the initramfs fails to do its job it can print to the console like
>> the kernel does if it fails
>> at a very early stage.
>>
> 
> Your solution might work for your small personal needs, but not for our customers.

Correct, I don't know your customers, all I know are my customers. :-)

What feature do your customers need?
I mean, I fully agree with you that an initramfs must not fail silently
but how does dbus help there? If it fails to mount the rootfs there is not
much it can do.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/