[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEVpBaLnV9xzDEa3ivNWkQWn4UYk3s1eeBFi2pn0=wGMFz+VYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:38:24 +0100
From: Mark Williamson <mwilliamson@...o-software.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Finn Grimwood <fgrimwood@...o-software.com>,
Daniel James <djames@...o-software.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: Requiring CAP_SYS_ADMIN for /proc/<pid>/pagemap
causes application-level breakage
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> Even though I've been accused (correctly?) of suggesting that, I'm not
> sure I like it anymore. Suppose I map some anonymous memory, learn
> its (scrambled) pfn, then unmap it and remap a setuid file. Now I can
> tell whether I've mapped the setuid file at the same pfn that was
> mapped as my anonymous memory. IIRC that's sufficient for one of the
> variants of Mark's attack.
In fairness, you may have mentioned it but it's entirely possible you
didn't originate the suggestion and I quoted out of context. Sorry
for implicating you ;-)
That's an attack that I hadn't considered when thinking about this
stuff. Zeroing the page frame numbers is an easier patch, so
arguments in favour of that are a happy answer as far as I'm
concerned!
Thanks,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists