[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5540EF78.8000409@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:19:28 +0530
From: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@...il.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/mm: Don't trace mm_page_pcpu_drain on offline
cpus
>> -DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(mm_page, mm_page_pcpu_drain,
>> +TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_page_pcpu_drain,
>>
>> TP_PROTO(struct page *page, unsigned int order, int migratetype),
>>
>> TP_ARGS(page, order, migratetype),
>>
>> + TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),
>> +
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field( unsigned long, pfn )
>> + __field( unsigned int, order )
>> + __field( int, migratetype )
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->pfn = page ? page_to_pfn(page) : -1UL;
>> + __entry->order = order;
>> + __entry->migratetype = migratetype;
>> + ),
>> +
>
> What was the need to do the above changes besides adding TP_CONDITION ?
>
IIUC there is no existing macro which can both add a condition and
override printk format, hence the fall back to TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION.
Thanks,
Shreyas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists