[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5540F4E9.7010100@imgtec.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:12:41 +0100
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@...tec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
CC: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS64: R6: R2 emulation bugfix
On 04/29/2015 10:49 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, James Hogan wrote:
>
>>> Error recovery pointers for fixups was improperly set as ".word"
>>> which is unsuitable for MIPS64.
>>>
>>> Replaced by __stringify(PTR)
>>
>> Every other case of this sort of thing uses STR(PTR) (or __UA_ADDR in
>> uaccess.h). Can we stick to STR(PTR) for consistency please?
>
> Or __PA_ADDR in paccess.h.
>
> I have mixed feelings, the reason for __stringify being absent is the
> macro being generic and more recently added than pieces of code that use
> STR, e.g. unaligned.c that has been there since forever. And we do use
> __stringify in many other cases.
>
> On the other hand STR is short and sweet, unlike __stringify.
The patch overall looks good to me so here is my
Reviewed-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>
I do agree with James that it would be nice to have it in stable 4.0+ as
well.
I don't particularly care if STR() is going to be used at the end or we
stick to __stringify. Both are used in arch/mips/* anyway
--
markos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists