linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] tty: serial: msm: Remove duplicate operations on clocks in startup/shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:15:56 +0530
From:	"Pramod Gurav" <gpramod@...eaurora.org>
To:	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	"Pramod Gurav" <gpramod@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	bryanh@...eaurora.org, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] tty: serial: msm: Remove duplicate operations on
 clocks in startup/shutdown

Thanks Stephen for review.

On Fri, April 10, 2015 11:33 pm, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/10/15 05:19, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>> @@ -683,8 +679,7 @@ static void msm_power(struct uart_port *port,
>> unsigned int state,
>>
>>  	switch (state) {
>>  	case 0:
>> -		clk_prepare_enable(msm_port->clk);
>> -		clk_prepare_enable(msm_port->pclk);
>> +		msm_init_clock(port);
>
> Hm... now we would call msm_serial_set_mnd_regs() whenever we power on
> the port? Presumably we only need to do that once when we probe (or when
> we resume from a sleep state that resets the registers, i.e.
> hibernation) but I guess we're getting saved by the fact that the
> if/else if pair in msm_serial_set_mnd_regs_from_uartclk would never be
> true after the first time we call it?

I tried replacing msm_init_clock() call with msm_serial_set_mnd_regs() in
msm_startup() as msm_startup gets called just after msm_power() so that
clk_prepare_enable() is followed by mnd settings. But it does not get the
kernel booted for some reason.

So, can I get a acked-by for this patch or you still think it can be done
in a better way?
>
>>  		break;
>>  	case 3:
>>  		clk_disable_unprepare(msm_port->clk);
>
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/