Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ7GxMMiu7U7u6bgDLut0Eme6TOowZZW9A3WXrjFuAexA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:55:45 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...sulko.com>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: overlay: Keep track of created overlays

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
<pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com> wrote:
> During the course of the overlay selftests some of them remain
> applied. While this does not pose a real problem, make sure you track
> them and destroy them at the end of the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>

This is already in for 4.1. Is this the same as the prior version.

Rob

> ---
>  drivers/of/unittest.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> index e844907..1801634 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +
>  #include "of_private.h"
>
>  static struct unittest_results {
> @@ -1109,6 +1111,59 @@ static const char *overlay_path(int nr)
>
>  static const char *bus_path = "/testcase-data/overlay-node/test-bus";
>
> +/* it is guaranteed that overlay ids are assigned in sequence */
> +#define MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS  256
> +static unsigned long overlay_id_bits[BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS)];
> +static int overlay_first_id = -1;
> +
> +static void of_unittest_track_overlay(int id)
> +{
> +       if (overlay_first_id < 0)
> +               overlay_first_id = id;
> +       id -= overlay_first_id;
> +
> +       /* we shouldn't need that many */
> +       BUG_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS);
> +       overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] |= BIT_MASK(id);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_unittest_untrack_overlay(int id)
> +{
> +       if (overlay_first_id < 0)
> +               return;
> +       id -= overlay_first_id;
> +       BUG_ON(id >= MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS);
> +       overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] &= ~BIT_MASK(id);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays(void)
> +{
> +       int id, ret, defers;
> +
> +       if (overlay_first_id < 0)
> +               return;
> +
> +       /* try until no defers */
> +       do {
> +               defers = 0;
> +               /* remove in reverse order */
> +               for (id = MAX_UNITTEST_OVERLAYS - 1; id >= 0; id--) {
> +                       if (!(overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] & BIT_MASK(id)))
> +                               continue;
> +
> +                       ret = of_overlay_destroy(id + overlay_first_id);
> +                       if (ret != 0) {
> +                               defers++;
> +                               pr_warn("%s: overlay destroy failed for #%d\n",
> +                                       __func__, id + overlay_first_id);
> +                               continue;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       overlay_id_bits[BIT_WORD(id)] &= ~BIT_MASK(id);
> +               }
> +       } while (defers > 0);
> +}
> +
>  static int of_unittest_apply_overlay(int unittest_nr, int overlay_nr,
>                 int *overlay_id)
>  {
> @@ -1130,6 +1185,7 @@ static int of_unittest_apply_overlay(int unittest_nr, int overlay_nr,
>                 goto out;
>         }
>         id = ret;
> +       of_unittest_track_overlay(id);
>
>         ret = 0;
>
> @@ -1343,6 +1399,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_6(void)
>                         return;
>                 }
>                 ov_id[i] = ret;
> +               of_unittest_track_overlay(ov_id[i]);
>         }
>
>         for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> @@ -1367,6 +1424,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_6(void)
>                                                 PDEV_OVERLAY));
>                         return;
>                 }
> +               of_unittest_untrack_overlay(ov_id[i]);
>         }
>
>         for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> @@ -1411,6 +1469,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
>                         return;
>                 }
>                 ov_id[i] = ret;
> +               of_unittest_track_overlay(ov_id[i]);
>         }
>
>         /* now try to remove first overlay (it should fail) */
> @@ -1433,6 +1492,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
>                                                 PDEV_OVERLAY));
>                         return;
>                 }
> +               of_unittest_untrack_overlay(ov_id[i]);
>         }
>
>         unittest(1, "overlay test %d passed\n", 8);
> @@ -1855,6 +1915,8 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay(void)
>         of_unittest_overlay_i2c_cleanup();
>  #endif
>
> +       of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays();
> +
>  out:
>         of_node_put(bus_np);
>  }
> --
> 1.7.12
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists