linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26519423.HuKjb3Mi85@merkaba>
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:25:12 +0200
From:	Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1

Am Mittwoch, 29. April 2015, 11:03:41 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:53:53PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > Sure, I can write one binary to rule them all, pull out all the code
> > from all tools I need, but for me an IPC mechanism sounds a lot
> > better. And it should be _one_ common IPC mechanism and not a
> > plethora of them. It should feel like an operating system and not
> > like a bunch of thrown together software, which is glued together
> > with some magic shell scripts.
> 
> And so requiring wireshark (and X?) in initramfs to debug problems
> once dbus is introduced is better?
> 
> I would think shell scripts are *easier* to debug when things go
> wrong, especially in a minimal environment such as an initial ram
> disk.  Having had to debug problems in a distro initramfs when trying
> to help a customer bring up a FC boot disk long ago in another life,
> I'm certain I would rather debug problems while on site at a
> classified machine room[1] using shell scripts, and trying to debug
> dbus is something that would be infinitely worse.

Later in boot process I have seen some debugging issues with a systemd 
governed userspace:

Bug 1213778 - drops into emergency mode without any error message if it 
cannot find a filesystem in /etc/fstab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213778

Bug 1213781 - does not start ssh service if a filesystem in /etc/fstab 
cannot be mounted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213781

With shell scripts I had error messages for these, here I had to browse 
the output of journalctl -xb to find out.

And then what do I do if dbus communication is not working for some 
reason? Will I then be able to use journalctl at all?

Not that proper error reporting can´t be added in systemd and the 
dependency handling can´t be fixed towards some more sanity like for 
example "no /boot mount, no worries, I still start that ssh service for 
you", but currently for me this is a clear and heavy regression when I 
compare this with sysvinit boot behavior.

I do fix things when being dropped to initramfs shell, I added some script 
snippet for supporting BTRFS RAID 1 while it wasn´t yet supported in 
Debian (dunno if it is for booting in Jessie, but as my bug reports have 
not been closed yet, maybe bot), I still want to be able to do these kinds 
of things.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/