[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCB2TzvefVxb4p8n=x_-uDVaO06xZHRU3q=qSxgKZCdQJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:17:57 -0400
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: mancha security <mancha1@...o.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler-intel: fix wrong compiler barrier() macro
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 06:40 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:59 AM, mancha security <mancha1@...o.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem is that ICC defines __GNUC__ so barrier() gets defined
>>> in compiler-gcc.h. Your commit removed an #undef from compiler-intel.h
>>> so compiler.h will never define barrier to __memory_barrier().
>>
>>
>> OK, I see your point. But, ICC has support for GCC inline assembly. So
>> the change does not seem to be making any difference. We are using our
>> own asm barrier rather than the inbuilt one provided by ICC.
>
>
> It does make a difference: gcc inline assembly is not supported by
> /ecc/, see that it's wrapped within the ifdef __ECC part. I believe,
> that should be for ia64 which we have under arch/, no?
Yes, looks like this breaks building the kernel with ecc compiler on
IA64. Has anyone tried building it with ECC on ia64 lately(or ever)?
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
--
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists