[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150429172457.GD2588@mguzik>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:24:58 +0200
From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
To: Shawn Chang <citypw@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix variable "error" missing initialization
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:00:34AM +0800, Shawn Chang wrote:
> From: Shawn C <citypw@...il.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn C <citypw@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/mlock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index c7f6785..660e5c5 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, int on)
> {
> unsigned long nstart, end, tmp;
> struct vm_area_struct * vma, * prev;
> - int error;
> + int error = 0;
>
> VM_BUG_ON(start & ~PAGE_MASK);
> VM_BUG_ON(len != PAGE_ALIGN(len));
> --
> 1.9.1
>
This change does not make sense.
The very first read of error is after it gets set.
I see you sent another patch which credited grsecurity. In their
patchset it makes sense - do_mlock is modified in a way which can
interrupt the loop upcoming loop before it gets the chance to set error.
--
Mateusz Guzik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists