[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hr3r2suiw.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:40:07 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
inki.dae@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "ARM: dts: add display power domain for exynos5250"
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> writes:
> This reverts commit 2d2c9a8d0a4f90e298315d2f4a282d8bd5d45e5c
> ("ARM: dts: add display power domain for exynos5250").
>
> The mentioned commit added a domain definition for the DISP1
> power domain and references to it in the appropriate devices
> but this change breaks the display in at least the Exynos5250
> based Snow and Spring Chromebooks.
>
> On these machines, the boot-loader enables the DISP1 domain and
> before the mentioned commit, the kernel didn't know about it so
> the power domain remained always enabled.
>
> But after that commit when the exynos-dp probe is deferred,
> the DISP1 domain is powered off and on again but the exynos-dp
> driver fails to configure the video showing the following error:
>
> exynos-dp 145b0000.dp-controller: Timeout of video streamclk ok
> exynos-dp 145b0000.dp-controller: unable to config video
>
> The same issue happens when the display is turned off and on
> again using DPMS.
>
> So, it seems the DISP1 power domain definition is not complete
> since the display works with the initialization made by the boot
> loader but it does not work when the power domain is enabled by
> the kernel.
>
> Having the definition in the DTS makes the power domain to be
> powered on when needed and powered off when not needed which is
> better in terms of power consumption but for now is safer to just
> revert the commit to avoid adding a regression in some machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
FWIW, this patch fixes the boot panics when using MMC rootfs on
exynos5800-peach-pi with current linux-next that have been happening
for awhile.
For several months now, DRM/display related stuff is very routinely
breaking basic booting on exynos5, which gives the rather strong
impression that the DRM stuff is not tested well enough to be merged.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists