[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMqctQmpYmD0J9=o6FVjJhXBc8b+oGd7cNh5aH_fmgE3vk5+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:44:59 +0200
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eric D." <eric.dillmann@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.
On 29 April 2015 at 19:40, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:43:37PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> > I know you have a viewpoint on this but engaging in this way is not
>> > helping anyone.
>
>> The point is that patching the kernel to use spidev is totally useless
>> complication which is brought on spidev users by obtuse kernel
>> maintainers.
>
>> This patch applied to a kernel which is distributed with the board
>> solves the problem for all spidev users of the board which
>> TheApprovedWay(tm) does not.
>
> Please stop this, it is not helpful.
Then please make one of the useful ways of instantiating spidev nodes
approved or suggest another that when implemented can be mainlined.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists