[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1430333633.23761.109.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:53:53 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2 10/20] pmem: use ida
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for the update. This version of the patchset enumerates our NFIT
> > table properly. :-)
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 14:25 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> In preparation for the pmem driver attaching to pmem-namespaces emitted
> >> by libnd, convert it to use an ida instead of an always increasing
> >> atomic index. This provides a bit of stability to pmem device names in
> >> the presence of driver re-bind events.
> > :
> >> @@ -122,20 +123,26 @@ static struct pmem_device *pmem_alloc(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> >> {
> >> struct pmem_device *pmem;
> >> struct gendisk *disk;
> >> - int idx, err;
> >> + int err;
> >>
> >> err = -ENOMEM;
> >> pmem = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!pmem)
> >> goto out;
> >>
> >> + pmem->id = ida_simple_get(&pmem_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > nd_pmem_probe() is called asynchronously via async_schedule_domain
> > (). We have seen a case that the region#->pmem# binding becomes
> > inconsistent across a reboot when there are 8 NVDIMM cards (reported by
> > Robert Elliott). This leads user to access a wrong device.
> >
> > I think pmem id needs to be assigned before async_schedule_domain(), and
> > cascaded to nd_pmem_probe().
> >
>
> I'll take a look at making this better, but it will never be
> bulletproof. For the same reason that root=UUID=<uuid> is preferred
> over root=/dev/sda userspace should never rely on consistent pmem
> device names from boot to boot.
I agree that constant unique IDs, such as UUIDs, are necessary to
guarantee their consistent numbering regardless of configuration
changes. For now, /dev/pmem%d should have consistent numbering while
NFIT table entries are consistent.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists